HowManyFPS Desktop App v1.25.3Track Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

FX-6300 vs Ryzen 5 3500X

The FX-6300 is much slower than the Ryzen 5 3500X on average across 100+ games. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $59.35 cheaper!

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

$40.65View CPUAll CPUs

Available for $40.65

CPU

$100.00View CPUAll CPUs

Up to 122% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 7 years newer

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

Counter-Strike 22023

FX-6300

364FPS

Ryzen 5 3500X

566FPS

League of Legends2009

FX-6300

122FPS

Ryzen 5 3500X

241FPS

Grand Theft Auto V2013

FX-6300

185FPS

Ryzen 5 3500X

208FPS

Escape From Tarkov2017

FX-6300

208FPS

Ryzen 5 3500X

225FPS

Valorant2020

FX-6300

539FPS

Ryzen 5 3500X

612FPS

Minecraft2011

FX-6300

575FPS

Ryzen 5 3500X

641FPS

Dota 22013

Elden Ring2022

146FPS

155FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

FX-6300

Ryzen 5 3500X

33%

Ryzen 5 3500X ranks 30 points higher.

Coreshelp

Threadshelp

L3 Cachehelp

8 MB

32 MB

Ryzen 5 3500X has 24 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

FX-6300

3.5 GHz

Ryzen 5 3500X

3.6 GHz

Ryzen 5 3500X has a 3% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

FX-6300

4.1 GHz

Ryzen 5 3500X

4.1 GHz

TDPhelp

FX-6300

95W

Ryzen 5 3500X

65W

Ryzen 5 3500X draws 30W less power.

Pricehelp

FX-6300

$40.65

Ryzen 5 3500X

$100.00

FX-6300 is $59.35 cheaper.

FX-6300Ryzen 5 3500X

AM3+

Sockethelp

AM4

Vishera

Codenamehelp

Matisse

Desktop

Segmenthelp

Desktop

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Integrated GPUhelp

No Integrated Graphics

1866 MHz (DDR3)

RAMhelp

3200 MHz (DDR4)

Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, FX-6300 or Ryzen 5 3500X?expand_more

The Ryzen 5 3500X. It's 1000% faster than the FX-6300 on average across 100+ games, scoring 33/100 vs 3/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Ryzen 5 3500X than FX-6300?expand_more

1000% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, FX-6300 or Ryzen 5 3500X?expand_more

The Ryzen 5 3500X is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Ryzen 5 3500X worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 33/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between FX-6300 and Ryzen 5 3500X?expand_more

Performance: FX-6300 scores 3/100, Ryzen 5 3500X scores 33/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the FX-6300 or Ryzen 5 3500X bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the FX-6300 or Ryzen 5 3500X?expand_more

The Ryzen 5 3500X is the stronger pick at 33/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.